Home Contact us Intranet KOREAN
  Home > Notices > Contributions
 
  Notices
Notices
Weekly Contributions
Monthly Contributions
Quarterly Labor cases

Connect to the app
The main business      
  Weekly Contributions
Subject   June 1st week - A Fatal Occupational Accident in Korea and Workers’ Compensation Rights



A Fatal Occupational Accident in Korea
and Workers’ Compensation Rights



Bongsoo
Jung (Labor attorney, KangNam Labor Law Firm)



 



I. Introduction



In October 2015, the Seoul International
Fireworks Festival was held at the Han River Park and provided a fantastic show
and good memories for many. However, during the night just before the fireworks
began, a daily worker (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased worker”) drowned
while working on preparations for this event. 
While the deceased worker was moving laser equipment for the fireworks
from a boat to a barge, he lost his balance, fell into the water and died. The
deceased worker was hired as a daily worker by the company that would operate
the laser equipment (hereinafter referred to as “Company A”), which in turn was
in a subcontract with the primary contractor (hereinafter referred to as
“Company B”) in charge of the whole fireworks project. In addition, the boat
where the accident happened belonged to a third company (hereinafter referred
to as “Company C”).



A funeral could not be held due to
disputes with the surviving family, so the president of Company A visited
KangNam Labor Law Firm and asked for its assistance in resolving this occupational
accident case. This labor law firm, representing Company A, explained the legal
responsibilities to each party and successfully helped them to reach an
amicable settlement. Here, I would like to explain how the claims in this occupational
accident were resolved, and the legal points of the disputes.   



 



II. Facts



On Saturday October 3, 2015, the
Seoul International Fireworks Festival 2015 was held at the Han River Park in
Yeouido. Company A had entered into a subcontract with Company B (presiding
over the fireworks for the festival), and was engaged in leasing, installing
and operating the laser equipment. Company A had hired the deceased worker as a
daily worker to be paid a daily rate of 100,000 won from September 29 to
install the laser equipment. The deceased worker had been working on this
installation with the president of Company A from 2 pm to late night on Friday,
October 2. At 10:30 in the evening, three persons (Company A’s president, the
deceased worker, and another employee) were moving the laser equipment from a 5
meter-long boat to a barge floating on the river between Wonhyo Bridge and the Han
River Train Bridge near Yeouido. While the deceased worker was lifting the
laser equipment from the motor boat to the barge, he lost his balance and fell into
the water. An underwater search begun very shortly after by the police failed
to find him. It was only on Sunday October 4, at 8:30 am, that his body was
found floating near the Han River Park (Yeouido area) and recovered by the
police.



The deceased worker was unmarried
at the time of death, and did not live with any family members. His parents
passed away years ago, and he is survived only by a brother and a sister. On
November 6, 2015, the surviving family reached a settlement with the president
of the contractor, Company B, and the president of the subcontractor, Company
A. The total amount of compensation came to 260 million won, with the surviving
family applying for part of that compensation to the Industrial Accident
Compensation Insurance (IACI) Agency directly, with the remainder (totaling 150
million won) to be paid by Company A and Company B to the surviving family no
later than November 10, 2015.



 



III. Responsible
Parties for Survivor’s Compensation



Company B,
responsible for the fireworks project, had exclusively subcontracted the related
laser operations to Company A. The daily worker, working for Company A but
while moving laser equipment from a boat belonging to Company C, fell into the
water and drowned. In this case, who is considered responsible as the employer?



Article 90
(Exception to Subcontracted Work) (1) stipulates “
If a business is operated based upon
several tiers of subcontracts, the primary contractor shall be regarded as the
employer for purposes of accident compensation.” For occupational accidents,
the employer who hired the employee shall be responsible as the employer with
the duty of ensuring safety. However, for construction projects, the primary
contractor is charged with general responsibilities of safety and health
regarding the safety facilities, safety nets, etc. required by the Occupational
Safety and Health Act. Accordingly, in cases where the primary contractor does
not fulfill its safety responsibilities, the primary contractor shall have the first
obligation to provide compensation.
[1]



In this case, Company
A, which had hired the deceased worker directly shall be first responsible as
his employer. Provided, as Company A was a subcontractor assigned to part of
the fireworks project by the primary contractor, as Article 90 of the Labor
Standards Act (
Exception to Subcontracted Work) states, the primary contractor shall be responsible
for compensation for damage. Accordingly, Company A and Company B shall hold
joint responsibility. In reality, it was agreed that Company A was responsible
for the IACI’s obligation, while Company A and Company B were both obligated to
cover any amount exceeding IACI compensation. On the other hand, as the
deceased worker had fallen to his death from a boat operated by Company C, the
surviving family may have legal claim separately against Company C. It was thus
agreed that the elements related to Company C could be handled separately from
this particular case. 



 



. Details of Compensation for Damages & Determining Settlement Amount



It is essential to
calculate substantial amounts for compensation under the IACI Act and for
compensation for damages from civil claims to reach an amicable
settlement.  Through accurate calculation
of compensation, the amounts the surviving family could claim and the
proportion to be covered by the related companies can be understood.   



 



1. Calculation of
compensation for damages under the IACI Act



(1) Basic data



   - Average daily wage: 73,000 won (daily wage
100,000 x 0.73: Applying to daily worker’s average working rate)



(2) Compensation under the IACI Act: 104,712,340 won



   - Survivor’s compensation: One day’s average
wage x 1300 days =



73,000 x 1300 = 94,900,000 won



   -
Funeral allowance[2] : One
day’s average wage x 120 days =



73,000 x 120 = 8,760,000 won.



The minimum official funeral allowance for 2015 is 9,812,342 won.



 



2. Compensation for
damage through civil claims[3]



(1) Basic data










1) Date of birth: May 13, 1972



    2) Date of accident occurrence: October
4, 2015 (43 years, 4 months, 21 days)



    3) 1 day’s average wage: 73,000 won
(daily wage 100,000 x 0.73: Applying to daily worker’s average working rate



 4) Standard unit of wage[4]:
102,144 won (based upon a supporting worker’s standard unit of wage in the
second half of 2015)



5)
End of expected working period[5]:
May 12, 2032 (199 months of potential working life remaining between the date
of death to 60 years of age)




 



(2) Substantial
calculation



1) The deceased
worker’s
lost wages



  
○ Between the date of death to 60 years of age (100% in terms of lost
working ability)  



     - Standard unit
of wage for supporting worker x 22 days[6] x deduction
of living expenses[7]
x the loss of working ability x Hoffmann’s figure
[8] from his death to
60 years



  
  - 102,144 won x 22 days x (1-1/3) x 100% x
144.7001 = 216,776,956 won



- 20% deducted due to mistakes
made by the deceased worker:



216,776,956 won x 80% =
173,421,564won



2) Compensation for emotional
damages



- 100,000,000 won[9]
x 100% (Loss of working ability) x [1-(mistakes by the victim x 0.6)]



- Deducting 20% for victim’s
actions brings this number to 88,000,000 won.



3) Compensation
through civil claims
: The deceased worker’s lost wages (173,421,564
won) +
Compensation for
emotional damage
(88,000,000 won)



=
261,421,564 won



 



3. Further details on reaching settlement   



It was important to accurately
calculate the compensation according to the IACI Act and compensation through
civil claims in order to reach a settlement between the surviving family and
Company A & Company B. Total compensation for this occupational fatality
was calculated as 261,421,564 won, which included 104,712,342 won in compensation
to be claimed under the IACI Act. The surviving family, Company A and Company B
negotiated with one another and finally agreed that Company A and Company B
would pay 150 million won directly to the surviving family, while the surviving
family would apply to the IACI Agency directly for the remaining compensation.[10]  This agreement stipulated that after the
related companies had paid the agreed compensation, the surviving family would take
no further civil, criminal, or administrative action against them. In addition,
the surviving family promised to submit a petition to the relevant
administrative offices to reduce the criminal charges against Company A and
Company B.



 



.
Content of Settlement (Settlement Agreement)



1. Parties to Agreement



1)
Party A: Subcontractor (Company A) and Contractor (Company B)



2)
Party B: Deceased worker’s siblings (brother and sister)



2. Details of the accident: -omitted-



3. Content of the settlement



1)
Party A will pay Party B 150 million won as settlement (excluding compensation under
the IACI Act) and compensation for emotional damages claimed under civil and
other laws, to the bank account designated by Party B. Party B will apply for
and receive compensation (Survivor’s compensation and funeral allowance) under
the IACI Act from the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service.  



2)
Since Party B amicably agreed with Party A on the above settlement for claims
by Party B and other relatives (lineal blood relatives, collateral blood
relatives, other relatives), Party B will not make any civil or criminal claims
such as filing of complaints, additional compensation, lawsuits, or any other
type of claims including for unexpected items at the time of agreement
regarding this accident in the future, and waive any claims regarding this
accident against Party A. 



3) Since the settlement in the above Article (1) includes
all compensation for emotional damages to Party B’s other relatives (lineal
blood relatives, collateral blood relatives, other relatives), Party B will be
responsible for any particular person among Party B’s other relatives making
complaints or other claims against Party A or persons related to Party A.



4)
As Party A and Party B have reached settlement amicably, Party B confirms that
Party  A and Party A’s employees related
to this accident will not receive criminal charges, and if necessary, Party B
will cooperate in submitting this intention to the related agencies.



5)
Party B confirms that this settlement agreement has been concluded with sincere
intentions after understanding all situations sufficiently on equal
footing, without
fraud, coercion, or mistake.



6) Party A and Party B shall compose four copies of the
settlement agreement, print and sign their respective names on each copy, and
keep one copy each after notarization of those copies, in
order to certify
this settlement agreement.



 



. Conclusion



Two lessons presented themselves in the course of resolving the claims from
this occupational accident. The first is the importance of industrial safety.
This occupational accident occurred through the failure to have safety measures
at the workplace, and could have been avoided if the deceased worker had worn a
life jacket while on the boat. The second is the importance of having an expert
resolve the complicated interests and disputes in an occupational accident.
This labor attorney was able to explain the legal obligations to the respective
parties, propose appropriate compensation, and successfully persuade each party
to reach agreement on a settlement.  









[1]Jongryul Lim, Labor Law, 13th
Edition, 2015, Parkyoung sa, pg. 487
; Sanggook Lee, Industrial Accident Compensation (I), 3rd
Edition, 2014, Daemyung Publishing Co., pg. 153.





[2] A
funeral allowance equivalent to 120 days’ average wages is paid to the
surviving family conducting a funeral service. As the employee’s wages are too
low to cover the funeral expenses, a system was introduced to determine maximum
and minimum allowances.
 
- As of 2015, the funeral allowance shall be a maximum
13,848,542 won, and a minimum 9,812,342 won.





[3] Introduction of Calculation Sheet for the Amount of
Damage Compensation (2005): Kiman Hong, Judge of Southern Seoul District Court





[4] Construction
Association of Korea, Standard unit cost of wage (Wage survey on the
construction industry): Effective from September 1, 2015.

* Daily workers can be categorized in the following three
groups:
   1) Non-professional workers (daily
wage 89,566 won): Workers engaged in light work not requiring specific skills;
simple, manual jobs.



2)
Skilled workers (daily wage 111,771 won): Workers engaged in relatively skilled
jobs, performing duties under special working conditions.



3)
Supporting workers (daily wage 102,144 won): Workers engaged in supporting a
skilled worker and under the directions of that skilled worker. 





[5] Remaining
working period is the period remaining in terms of working years up to the
retirement age determined by the Collective Agreement or the Rules of
Employment, and if a retirement age has not been introduced, the legal
retirement age (60 years) is regarded as the end of the expected working
period. (Article 73 of the IACI Enforcement Decree (Paragraph 3))





[6] Daily workers in agriculture are determined to work 25
days a month, while other daily workers are determined to work 22 days a month.
 





[7] Living expenses equivalent to one third (33.33%) are
deducted from total wages.





[8] 1. (Sisa Encyclopedia, Park Moon Kak) Hoffmann and
Leibnitz calculation methods



If compensation is made in the form of a lump sum paid in
advance, rather than each month until a certain ending period, deductions
should be made equivalent to the interest that would be paid in the latter case
for payments made in the future. In this case, the Hoffman method is for simple
interest, while the Leibnitz method is for compound interest.



2. Generally, the Hoffmann method is preferable for employed
victims, and is more often used in compensation for civil claims. In the IACI
Act, the Leibnitz method is designated only for calculating Special Disability Benefits.
Which method is used for calculating compensation should be determined exclusively
by the court according to a Supreme Court ruling (Supreme Court July 28, 1983,
83 da 191).





[9] As
of March 1,
2015, the standard compensation amount
for emotional damage for an occupational accident is 100 million won.





[10] Related judicial ruling (Seoul High Court ruling on
September 10, 2000, 99 nu 15343): The compensation that a person receives for
an occupational accident from the employer separately from the compensation under
the IACI Act refers to compensation received other than the compensation under
the IACI Act. Therefore, the right to claim benefits for the occupational
accident under the IACI Act shall not be extinguished.






File   (8-2)_산재_사망사고가_발생하던_사업주는_어떤_조치를_해야_하는가.jpg
File   2026년 6월 1주차 업무상 사망사고와 산재보상 권리 English.pdf
[List]

268 (1/14)
No Subject Date Access
June 1st week - A Fatal Occupational Accident in Korea and Workers’ Compensation Rights 26.05.31 34
267 May 4th week - Labor Inspection Checklist (2026) 26.05.24 200
266 May 3rd week - Procedures for Subcontracted Worker Unions to Participate in Collective Bargaining 26.05.17 261
265 May 2nd week - Foreign Worker Fatality and Survivors’ Compensation: Beneficiary Status, Industrial Accident Benefits, and Civil?Criminal Settlement 26.05.10 452
264 May 1st week - Legal Standards for Prohibiting Discrimination under Labor Law and Key Judicial Precedents 26.05.03 523
263 April 4th week - Key Labor Law Standards for Part-Time Workers Employers Should Know 26.04.26 1183
262 April 3rd week - The Relationship Between the Civil Act and the Labor Standards Act in Employment Termination 26.04.19 3120
261 April 2nd week - The Expectation of Contract Renewal for Fixed-Term Employees – Criteria for Determination and Key Case Law 26.04.12 904
260 April 1st week - Understanding Korean Labor Law within the Continental Law System in Comparison with the Common Law System of Anglo-American Countries 26.04.05 1908
259 March 5th week_Case Recognizing the Necessity of Extending the Retirement Age: Extension of the Working-Life Expectancy of Manual Workers 26.03.29 4814
258 March 4th week - Employees’ Duty of Loyalty and Employers’ Duty of Care – Key Cases 26.03.22 838
257 March 3rd week - Priority of Favorable Employment Contracts Over Rules of Employment 26.03.15 1397
256 March 2nd week - Retirement Pay Installment Agreements and Case Law Changes 26.03.08 1492
255 March 1st week - A Case Recognizing the Death of a High-Speed Train Driver from Overwork as an Industrial Accident 26.03.02 1943
254 February 4th week - Separation of Bargaining Units System in Collective Bargain 26.02.21 3159
253 February 3rd week - Recent Court Decisions on Annual Leave and Proposals for Improvement 26.02.15 1412
252 February 2nd week - The Concept of Workplace Harassment and the Criteria for Its Determination 26.02.07 26513
251 February 2nd week - Six Criteria for Determining the Validity of a Non-Compete Agreement 26.02.01 4917
250 January 4th week - Dismissal Decision of the Disciplinary Committee and the Standards of Review in Cases Alleging Workplace Harassment and Sexual Harassment 26.01.25 1547
249 January 3rd week - A Case on Determining Workplace Harassment Involving Repeated Verbal Abuse by a Supervisor Toward a New Employee 26.01.17 1912

[First][Prev] [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [Next] [Last]
     

[Address] A-1501 406, Teheran-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06192 Korea (Daechi-Dong, Champs Elysees Center)

Tel : 02-539-0098, Fax : 02-539-4167, E-mail : bongsoo@k-labor.com

Copyright© 2012 ~ 2026 K-Labor. All rights reserved.  [Privacy Policy]