Home Contact us Intranet KOREAN
  Home > Notices > Contributions
 
  Notices
Notices
Weekly Contributions
Monthly Contributions
Quarterly Labor cases

Connect to the app
The main business      
  Monthly Contributions
Subject   November 2024 - A Case of Workplace Harassment

A Case of Workplace Harassment
Bongsoo Jung, a Korean labor attorney at KangNam Labor Law Firm


III. Reporting Workplace Harassment and Employer Responsibilities

1. Distinction Between Workplace Harassment and Workplace Sexual Harassment
Under the current Gender Equality in Employment Act, "workplace sexual harassment" is defined as an employer, supervisor, or employee using their position or work-related circumstances to subject another employee to unwanted sexual behavior, causing sexual humiliation or offense, or causing disadvantage in employment or working conditions if the individual does not comply (Article 2, Paragraph 2). "Sexual behavior" includes actions, depending on the relationship between the parties, location, situation, and the explicit or presumed response of the recipient, that would objectively lead a reasonable person in the recipient’s situation to feel sexual humiliation or offense. This encompasses making unwanted sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, gender-discriminatory remarks, or treating the recipient as a sexual object or with sexual bias in words and actions.
Under the Labor Standards Act, "workplace harassment" is defined as an act by an employer or employee that abuses their position or relationship superiority at work to inflict physical or psychological suffering on another employee or worsens their work environment beyond reasonable work bounds (Article 76-2). In this case, although the department head did not engage in overtly sexual behavior toward the female employee, his persistent expressions of affection continued despite her clear rejections. In a similar lower court case, persistent contact and excessive work orders from a supervisor who had been rejected after proposing a romantic relationship were judged to constitute workplace harassment.

2. Employer Responsibilities
Under current law regarding workplace sexual harassment, the Gender Equality in Employment Act states that if sexual harassment is confirmed following an investigation, the employer must promptly take appropriate action, such as disciplinary measures or relocating the perpetrator, after consulting the employee victim on the proposed action (Article 14, Paragraph 5). Failure to comply can result in a fine of up to 5 million won (Article 39).
Regarding workplace harassment, the Labor Standards Act similarly stipulates that if harassment is confirmed, the employer must immediately take appropriate measures, including disciplinary action or relocation of the perpetrator, after consulting the victim on the proposed action (Article 76-3, Paragraph 4). Failure to comply can also result in a fine of up to 5 million won (Article 116).
In this case, the employer is obligated to assess whether workplace harassment occurred and implement appropriate disciplinary action. Generally, employers should refer to the disciplinary provisions in the company’s employment regulations to determine what disciplinary action is appropriate to take against the respondent (perpetrator) and the right protective measures for the complainant (victim).

V. Conclusion
Workplace harassment occurs in a variety of forms and is increasingly being reported rather than tolerated. This case exemplifies harassment established by continuous expressions of affection toward a subordinate in a way that leveraged workplace authority. A department head in his 40s initiating personal meetings and relationship with a female employee in her early 30s, who has only been with the company for two years and despite her clear expressions of rejection and of her discomfort, represents a classic instance of workplace harassment, as the superior used his power to infringe on the subordinate’s personal rights.
While mutual expressions of affection or romantic relationships between consenting adults are possible within the workplace, persistent expressions of affection after a clear rejection disregard the individual’s personal rights and can constitute harassment or abuse of power. Recognizing that workplace harassment can readily arise, it is essential for labor and management to foster mutual respect for personal rights, and further the development of a work culture where all employees can achieve personal growth.


File   10 직장 내 괴롭힘 성희롱 예방.jpg
File   10 직장 내 괴롭힘 성희롱 예방.JPG
[List]

244 (1/13)
No Subject Date Access
244 April 2026 - Work Instructions from the Chairperson: When Do They Constitute Workplace Harassment? 26.03.31 1072
243 March 2026 - Retaliation Against an Employee for Reporting Workplace Harassment 26.03.01 725
242 February 2026 - Procedures for Subcontracted Worker Unions to Participate in Collective Bargaining 26.02.01 1899
241 January 2026 - Understanding the Yellow Envelope Act Properly 26.01.01 11392
240 December 2025 - Foreign Worker Fatality: Case Handling and Implications 25.12.01 5784
239 November 2025 - Burden of Proof and Single Occurrences of Verbal Abuse in Claims of Workplace Harassment 25.11.01 6645
238 October 2025 - Correction of Discrimination in Childcare Leave: Major Cases 25.10.02 8107
237 September 2025 - Compensation for Damages in Cases of Workplace Bullying 25.08.31 15012
236 August 2025 - Labor-Management Autonomy through Collective Bargaining 25.08.02 4092
235 July 2025 - Unfair Dismissal After Maternity Leave: A Case and Its Implications 25.07.01 9255
234 June 2025 - A Case Involving a Claim of Workplace Harassment and a Company’s Exercise of Personnel Authority 25.06.01 11005
233 May 2025 - Criteria for Determining the Employee Status of Non-Registered Executive Officers under the Labor Standards Act 25.05.01 13079
232 April 2025 - Labor Law Protections for Construction Workers 25.04.02 14751
231 March 2025 - A Case of Workplace Harassment: Employer’s Abuse of Power 25.03.01 14587
230 February 2025 - Implications of the Supreme Court En Banc Rulings on Ordinary Wages (2013 and 2024) 25.02.02 14126
229 January 2025 - Do Negative Remarks About the HR Manager in a General Meeting Constitute Workplace Harassment? 25.01.01 4257
228 December 2024 - Determining Applicability of the Labor Standards Act for Foreign Companies with Fewer than Five Employees 24.12.01 8326
November 2024 - A Case of Workplace Harassment 24.11.02 4250
226 October 2024 - Changing Employment Permit System Foreign Workers to Skilled Technical Workers 24.10.02 20085
225 September 2024 - Judgments on Cases of Workplace Harassment 24.09.01 7085

[First][Prev] [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [Next] [Last]
     

[Address] A-1501 406, Teheran-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06192 Korea (Daechi-Dong, Champs Elysees Center)

Tel : 02-539-0098, Fax : 02-539-4167, E-mail : bongsoo@k-labor.com

Copyright© 2012 ~ 2026 K-Labor. All rights reserved.  [Privacy Policy]