Home > Notices > Contributions
 
  Notices
Notices
Weekly Contributions
Monthly Contributions
Quarterly Labor cases

Connect to the app
The main business
  Monthly Contributions
Subject   November 2017 - Japan’s Foreign Employment System
Japan’s Foreign Employment System

I. Introduction
Japan’s labor law system has had a great impact on the formation of labor laws in Korea. In 1953, when many of Korea’s labor laws were enacted (the Labor Standards Act, the Labor Union Act, the Labor Relations Adjustment Act, and the Labor Relations Commission Act), Japan’s labor laws were an important reference point. The Immigration Act of the Justice Ministry has also been influenced by Japan's Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Immigration Control Act"), which is still influential in the management of foreigners in Korea. Japan enacted its Immigration Act (which strictly controlled foreigners) in 1951, and has adhered to two principles when it accepts foreigners. First, acceptance is in principle limited to foreigners engaged in professional work, and not to those engaged in simple labor. Second, acceptance for immigration under the premise of permanent settlement and permanent residence in Japan is not permitted in principle. While there is a gradual shift toward more accommodation for foreigners due to the recruitment of highly-talented individuals and a lack of manpower due to aging/low fertility, the basic principles are still observed.

II. Status of and Policy Direction for Foreign Workers in Japan
According to immigration statistics the Ministry of Justice, the total number of foreigners staying in Japan exceeded 1 million in 1989, 2 million in 2005, and was about 2.69 million at the end of 2015; a figure which accounts for 2.2% of the total population of 121.71 million, and which has been increasing by an average of 8.1% since 2011. As of the end of October 2015, there were about 908,000 foreign workers in Japan, including approximately ①168,000 persons for training purposes, ②367,000 persons with status as overseas Japanese, ③167,000 persons recognized as employed in the "professional and technical fields", ④192,000 other persons such as overseas students, and ⑤ those in "specific activities" (nurses/caregivers, and highly-talented professionals who received preferential treatment through the point system). As of 2016, there were also about 6.2 million illegal immigrants, including those who were not employed.
Japan’s policy of introducing foreign workers has consistently maintained a stance of attracting specialized foreign workers in the professional and technical fields, but of not importing unskilled foreign workers in principle. In response to labor shortages caused by the aging and declining population, the Japanese government now prioritizes the participation of Japanese nationals such as women and the elderly in the labor market. Among foreign workers, professionals and overseas Japanese descendants are actively accepted through institutional preferences, while unskilled foreign workers have been restrained by the Industrial Trainee System, which is based on the principle of "replacement circulation". Recently, however, the Abe government has been reviewing an expansion of the system which would introduce non-skilled foreign workers, focusing on industries with a shortage of manpower, “in order to expand the utilization of female workers and economic growth.” It is now actively introducing unskilled personnel such as homeworkers in addition to the introduction of foreign professionals.

III. Foreign Worker Employment System
1. Japan's unskilled foreign workers
The official position is that Japan does not introduce unskilled foreign workers. Currently, the Technical Intern Training Program is not designed to use foreigners as workers, but is rather a program that trains workers in developing countries in Asia and prepares them to work in industries in those countries. Although this intention was initially maintained to a certain extent, foreign workers are now being used by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) because of the insufficient labor force in Japan, and the society’s tendency to avoid what Korea calls “3D jobs” (dirty, difficult, dangerous) jobs. However, it is obvious that the worker still provides work in his/her trainee status, while yet maintaining the original intent.
The introduction of simple laborers in Japan can be divided into two stages, and can be explained according to each stage. The first stage was the Foreign Trainee Program (1993-2010); under this program, foreigners worked as trainees, not as workers. As a result, many human rights violations occurred due to the failure to apply labor laws, and so the Technical Intern Training Program (2010-present) was introduced to improve the situation. However, even in this second stage, the exploitation of foreign workers was severe and violation of the labor law did occur, which led to the Foreigners’ Technical Intern Training Act (2016), which was introduced to strengthen labor law protections.
In 1990, SMEs accepted foreign trainees for the purpose of cultivating manpower for developing countries. In 1993, the Trainee Program was implemented so that foreigners who had completed one year of training could work in Japan for a maximum of two years. 'Training' referred to not only lectures, but also to training in the field. Because trainees were not workers, a 'training allowance' was paid in place of a wage. In actual fact, companies paid foreign trainees low wages, and even the training allowance was less than the minimum wage. There were many cases where Japanese SMEs exploited the Foreign Trainee Program by using young workers from developing countries as a low-cost labor force without the protection of the Labor Standards Act or the right to the minimum wage. Such violations of human rights and the poor treatment of trainees soon became social problems.
In order to address the human rights violations, Japan abolished the existing Foreign Trainee Program in July 2010 and replaced it with the Technical Intern Training Program, and from the beginning introduced low-skilled foreign manpower as having employee status. Technical trainees were allowed to stay in Japan for a maximum of three years, less the two-month training period. Permission for the entry of technical trainees was structured so that the accepting company or the supervising organization applied to the local immigration office. By the end of June 2016, there were about 210,000 technical trainees nationwide, composed of Chinese (85,000), Vietnamese (72,000), Filipinos (21,000), Indonesians (17,000), and others.
The Technical Intern Training Act of November 2016 classifies trainee status as "Technical Intern Training No. 1" for the first year of entry, "Technical Intern Training No. 2" for the second and third years, and "Technical Intern Training No. 3" for the fourth and fifth years. The target jobs are relative to the needs of the sending countries, and job descriptions established by the Technical Skill Evaluation System, in accordance with the notification from the Minister of Health and Labor. (As of March 31, 2017, these comprised 74 jobs and 133 jobs respectively).
The following features are understood as relates to the Technical Intern Training Program:
First, the period of stay for technical trainees is limited to three years. Since foreigners work for three years and then must return to their home country, employers do not give them an opportunity to acquire important skills, but provide only simple repetitive work, and so foreign workers are unable to get any further technical education. Companies regard foreign workers as those who need to be replaced after a certain period of stay, similar to a dispatch worker.
Second, re-entry is prohibited. The Technical Intern Training Program does not give the skilled foreign workers the opportunity to re-enter after their stay of three years, and companies do not recognize the skilled or semi-skilled abilities of such workers. Ind

File   202203291703_640.pdf
[List]

219 (1/11)
No Subject
219 March 2024 - Case Study: Appropriate Employer Response to Workplace Harassment Reports
218 February 2024 - Whether a Study Room Manager’s Working Hours can be recognized as Full-time Work
217 January 2024 -Appropriate Responses to Different Types of Industrial Actions
216 December 2023 - The Workplace Harassment Case Involving a Dispatched Worker
215 November 2023 - Workplace Harassment Cases Arising from Excessive Work by a Superior
214 October 2023 - Precedents Following the Supreme Court's Unanimous Decision on Ordinary Wages
213 September 2023 - Work-Related Fatality: Army Sergeant Dies due to Overwork
212 August 2023 - Workplace Harassment after Employee Request for Remedy against Unfair Demotion
211 July 2023 - Case Study: A Claim of Workplace Harassment and the related Handling Process
210 June 2023 - Selection of Employee Representatives & Effects
209 May 2023 - Workplace Sexual Harassment and Bullying: A Case Analysis - Supreme Court ruling on November 25, 2021, 2020da270503 -
208 April 2023 - Labor Inspection over Unpaid Wages for Temporary Workers
207 March 2023 - Dismissal of the Finance Director of a Foreign-invested Company
206 February 2023 - Workplace Harassment Resolved through Recognition of an Accident as Related to Work
205 January 2023 - A Case of Workplace Harassment and the Criteria for Recognizing Consequent Mental Illness as an Occupational Accident
204 December 2022 - Cases of Workplace Bullying & Sexual Harassment and Disciplinary Committee Decisions
203 November 2022 - The Confusing Administrative Interpretation from the Ministry of Employment and Labor on Calculating Severance Pay
202 October 2022 - When Workplace Harassment Occurs, What Measures Should an Employer Take?
201 September 2022 - Dismissal of Offline Employees due to Transferring of Business to the Internet
200 August 2022 - A Case Study on Workplace Harassment against a New Employee

[First][Prev] [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [Next] [Last]
     

[Address] A-1501 406, Teheran-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06192 Korea (Daechi-Dong, Champs Elysees Center)

Tel : 02-539-0098, Fax : 02-539-4167, E-mail : bongsoo@k-labor.com

Copyright© 2012 K-Labor. All rights reserved.  [Privacy Policy]